phrase requests - Other words to replace lets? - English Language . . . The relationship between z and w, on the other hand… Otherwise, know that a basic search will turn up let us in innumerable journal articles, official proclamations, formal invitations, political speeches, and all manner of other speech and writing that would be deemed "formal" so it's unclear what kind of answer you are looking for
The phrase let alone - English Language Usage Stack Exchange I notice that "let alone" is used in sentences that have a comma The structure of the sentence is what comes before the comma is some kind of negative statement Right after the comma is "let alon
verbs - Lets vs. lets: which is correct? - English Language . . . Let’s is the English cohortative word, meaning “let us” in an exhortation of the group including the speaker to do something Lets is the third person singular present tense form of the verb let meaning to permit or allow In the questioner’s examples, the sentence means to say “Product (allows permits you to) do something awesome”, so the form with lets is correct
The passive with let - English Language Usage Stack Exchange Let normally occurs with a clause of some sort as complement, and passive is unlikely with a clausal object: Bill wants me to come to the party would be passivized to *For me to come to the party is wanted by Bill, which is hardly an improvement So let doesn't normally passivize
Please let me know. - English Language Usage Stack Exchange The issue is whether the sentence can stand on its own; "Let me know" can but doesn't really acquire useful meaning without a context The examples I offered are other sentences with similar structures "Let me [verb]" seems okay to me; so does " [verb] " Feel free to look for a verb that doesn't work here; it wouldn't surprise me if one exists
Let alone phrase - English Language Usage Stack Exchange The let alone construction has been analyzed in great and precise detail in a famous paper by Fillmore, Kay, and O'Connor: " Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone ", Language, Vol 64, No 3 (1988:501-38) EDIT: By request The two clauses have to be on a certain scale of meaning; one of the clauses must describe a situation that is less on that scale
idioms - Meaning of let bygones be bygones - English Language Usage . . . 'Let bygones be bygones' uses both meanings of the word 'bygones' and means, in extended form, 'let the unpleasantness between us become a thing of the past' So I think, the meaning of the phrase is closer to your first meaning versus the second
phrases - Lets get started! or lets get going? - English Language . . . In "Let's get started", the starting point is in view and "Let's get going", you are on the starting point already Moreover, there is a sense of extra involvement abundantly made clear by the sentence, " Let's start going"
Not to Mention ≈ [Let Alone ≈ Much Less ≈ Still Less] I find the distinction that MacMillan makes between not to mention and the supposedly synonymous let alone and still much even less useful: The phrases let alone and still much even less reinforce a negative or unlikely statement that precedes them The still much even less constructs reinforce the negativity of the preceding phrase by subtraction -- Negative statement, still much even less